View source

From Atlantic Roleplay Wiki

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You can view and copy the source of this page:

'''Title: Government I''' '''Author: Ashlath''' ------------------------------------ '''DESPOTISM''' In a Despotic government, the Leader is a military dictator whose authority ultimately rests on force of arms and the secret police. Despotic Leaders enjoy a great deal of clout, as the Despotic system of government concentrates power in their hands. For the same reason, Despotic governments are always highly centralized. Since the Leader and other powerful members of the government are subject to few checks on their authority, opportunities for corruption abound. Ruthless use of the internal security apparatus can help keep corruption in check, but care must be taken to ensure that this does not merely displace most of the corruption to the internal security forces themselves. Should the regime''s backing dissolve, despotic Leaders risk losing their grip on power and, often, their lives as well. It is not difficult for the military and internal security to replace the Leader in a coup provided that they remain united. However, succession often triggers vicious internecine power struggles, which, if they go on for a protracted period, can bring down the whole system. Similar difficulties attend Despotic governments when the Leader retires or dies in office. Many despots try to pass on the office of Leader to their children, thereby founding a dynasty. In this way, Despotic regimes can, over time, become Monarchies. '''MONARCHY''' A Monarchy can be anything from a feudal system in which the monarch outranks other nobles only slightly to a regime in which the monarch is considered to be a living god, whose every whim carries the force of law. But there is one constant: a Monarch who claims to rule by right of succession. Being a blood descendent of the reigning monarch is preferred, but it is not the only method. Should an entire dynasty come to a end, pretenders to the throne may claim to be descended from members of a previous royal family. Only monarchs unable to claim the throne by blood, or true tyrants, are likely to rely heavily on the military to prop up their governments. Most others rest upon their hereditary claim on the throne, buttressed by tradition. A certain amount of corruption is practically inevitable, especially when personal funds intermingle with those of the treasury. Transfers of power show Monarchy at both its strongest and its weakest. When one member of the ruling dynasty succeeds another, the transition will be smooth and the new regime''s legitimacy virtually unquestioned. ("The king is dead! Long live the king!") This legitimacy can come at a heavy price, however, as when the heir is not competent to govern. While this spells trouble for the government, installing someone other than the legitimate heir to the throne often leads to even worse trouble. If someone usurps the throne from the rightful heir, or if the empire has the misfortune to have its monarch die without an heir or clearly designated successor, widespread unrest and even civil war are more than likely to follow. '''OLIGARCHY''' The word "oligarchy" means "rule by the few." In general, an Oligarchy is a transitional form of regime in which only a very small minority of the population is enfranchised. Depending on the faction(s) enfranchised, an oligarchic regime could be known by any number of names. For example, an Oligarchy dominated by the military and internal security is generally referred to as a "Junta," while an Oligarchic regime run by the social elite will often call itself an "Aristocracy." Many less familiar forms are also possible, e.g. "Technocracy," in which members of the scientific elite govern. All formal power in Oligarchies resides in a council chosen by the enfranchised few. Oligarchs fear allowing any one of their number to accumulate too much power, so leadership of the council changes often. Inter-council politics are tumultuous and rife with intrigue. and the Leader of an Oligarchy therefore has less clout and less time to concentrate on administrative matters than do leaders of more stable regimes. Government officials are not subject to consistent oversight, and the current Leader has a strong incentive to overlook the misdeeds of other council members in order to maintain goodwill, so Oligarchic governments are often quite corrupt. '''CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY''' This is a transitional form of government that lies between Monarchy and Representative types of governments. The Leader is a monarch who must share power with an elected parliament. Unlike in most other governments, the Leader of a Constitutional Monarchy is frequently a figurehead (i.e., is disenfranchised), while the real power lies with the Prime Minister of parliament. A party in parliament with the monarch's support and a strong majority can run roughshod over the opposition, but if the monarch is at odds with parliamentary leaders or if the party in power lacks a firm mandate, gridlock can result. Monarchs do not have to worry about being re-elected, so they generally have more time to devote to affairs of state than leaders of some other government types. Thanks to the split in accountability between the monarch and the parliament, and historical prerogatives that any monarch will retain, Constitutional Monarchies afford greater scope for corruption than do Representative governments. Nevertheless, corruption is generally much lower than in Monarchies. Constitutional Monarchies are fairly stable. While frequent changes of prime minister are to be expected, the monarch provides the government with continuity. [[Category:History]]

Return to Government 1.